A Sydney woman has been granted permission to use her late husband’s sperm by the NSW Supreme Court.
Joel and Yoshiko Chapman were married in 2017 and “expressed a desire to have children”, however, earlier this year Mr Chapman suffered a stroke caused by complications of a neurosurgical procedure and never regained consciousness.
Upon being advised that her husband was unlikely to survive, Mrs Chapman applied for the removal and storage of a sperm sample. The judge ruled for the extraction procedure to take place following Mr Chapman’s death and directed that the sperm sample should be stored in anticipation of a further order of the court.
The Supreme Court considered the following issues:
The Court ruled that Mrs Chapman was entitled to the sperm sample on the basis that it was a release of property to which she was already allowed.
This decision follows precedence set by a Queensland Supreme Court ruling, in which a woman was granted possession of a sperm sample extracted from her recently deceased partner following his suicide.
Both rulings have been considered problematic by Australian-based family law firms. Practitioners indicated that there is no legal basis in which “an individual’s reproductive tissue — in this instance, sperm — could be considered as property.”
The NSW Supreme Court has also responded to this gap in legislation, calling for
parliament to provide clearer guidance on this issue of consent.
Whether making, updating or contesting a will, getting proper legal advice is vital. Call Szabo & Associates today on 02 9281 5088 to book an appointment or to speak with one of our specialist solicitors with the experience to help you ensure your wishes are met. Alternatively, please complete the contact form on the right-hand side of this page.
By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://szabosolicitors.com.au/
For more information or to book a consultation, call us on
02 9281 5088